Stock Market

Al Meezan vs. UBL Funds vs. MCB-Arif Habib: Comparing Islamic Mutual Funds

S
Written bySadia Faiz
Published • Global Markets & Remittance Contributor

Three asset managers dominate the conversation when Pakistani investors ask for Shariah-compliant mutual funds: Al Meezan Investments, UBL Fund Managers (whose Islamic range is branded Al Ameen), and MCB (whose Islamic range is branded Alhamra). A note on names: MCB’s asset manager is many people’s “MCB-Arif Habib,” the name it was long marketed under. Its current materials use MCB Funds and MCB Investment Management Limited, so search for those names too.

This guide compares the funds where data is available, starting with what is solid and flagging what is not. Figures come from fund reports and fund-data websites, which sometimes disagree, so confirm details in each fund’s latest Fund Manager’s Report (FMR).

This is general information, not investment advice. Fund returns are not guaranteed, and equity funds can lose money.

The Three Fund Houses at a Glance

Al Meezan InvestmentsUBL Fund Managers (Al Ameen)MCB Funds (Alhamra)
Islamic equity fundMeezan Islamic Fund (MIF)Al-Ameen Shariah Stock FundAlhamra Islamic Stock Fund
Islamic cash/money marketMeezan Cash Fund, Rozana Amdani Fund, Islamic Asaan Cash FundAl Ameen Islamic Cash FundAlhamra Islamic Money Market Fund
Islamic incomeMeezan Islamic Income FundAl Ameen rangeAlhamra Islamic Income Fund
Shariah supervisionShariah advisory board (details in the fund’s offering document)Shariah advisory committee (see offering documents)Board chaired by Justice (Retd.) Muhammad Taqi Usmani, with two further advisors
Digital investingMobile app, web portal, Raast, EasyPaisa walletCheck the websiteiSAVE (from Rs 500) and WhatsApp

Equity Funds Compared

Islamic equity funds hold Shariah-screened shares, mostly from the KMI-30 universe, and are high-risk.

DetailMeezan Islamic FundAlhamra Islamic Stock FundAl-Ameen Shariah Stock Fund
Launched8 August 200325 August 2004Not verified here
Fund sizeRs 65.9 billion (31 Aug 2026)Rs 9.84 billion (23 Oct 2026)Not verified here
BenchmarkKMI-30KMI-30 (risk measures shown against it)Not verified here
Total expense ratio3.96% year to date (August 2026)4.03%Not verified here
Front-end load2.00%3%Not verified here
Back-end loadNil (one source notes 2% on a unit class)3%Not verified here
Risk ratingHighHighNot verified here

What stands out:

  • Costs are high across Islamic equity funds. Both funds with confirmed ratios charge roughly 4% a year in total expenses, which comes out of your return every year before you see it.
  • Loads differ. Alhamra shows a 3% load on both entry and exit (a spread of about 3.34% between buying and selling prices on the day checked), while Meezan Islamic Fund shows a 2% front-end load and no back-end load on the main unit class.
  • Holdings overlap heavily. Both funds hold the same large names, so performance differences come mostly from weights and costs, not different strategies.
Top holdings (approximate share of assets)Meezan Islamic Fund (Aug 2026)Alhamra Islamic Stock Fund (Sep 2026)
Oil & Gas Development Co.11.12%7.90%
Meezan Bank9.02%9.80%
Lucky Cement8.39%5.90%
Engro Holdings5.90%6.20%
Pakistan PetroleumNot in the top 10 shown8.00%
Hub Power8.96%Not in the top 5 shown

How They Have Performed

Data dates differ below, so do not compare the columns as if they cover the same days.

FundSource and date1-yearLonger view
Meezan Islamic FundAl Meezan FMR, 31 Aug 2026+13.06% (benchmark +18.50%)3 years +235.00% (benchmark +235.68%); 5 years +194.74% (benchmark +224.13%)
Meezan Islamic FundFund-data sites, 27 Oct 2026About -4% to -5.5%Year-to-date about -11%
Alhamra Islamic Stock FundFund-data page, 23 Oct 2026-2.56%3 years +203.13%
Al-Ameen Shariah Stock FundFund-data page, 26 Oct 2026-3.67%Year-to-date about -11%

The weak late-October numbers reflect the market: the KSE-100 closed at 162,375 on 23 October 2026, below its end-2025 close of about 174,054. All three Islamic equity funds are negative over one year as of late October, and within a few percentage points of each other. Differences between data websites (for example, Meezan’s one-year figure) show why you should check the official FMR rather than a single aggregator.

Cash and Income Funds Compared

For money you cannot afford to see fall, the Islamic cash and income funds matter more than the equity funds.

FundSizeReported figuresExpense and loads
Meezan Cash FundRs 176.5 billion9.94% fiscal-year-to-date (benchmark 10.19%)Management fee 1%, no front load, 0.1% back-end load within 3 days
Meezan Rozana Amdani FundRs 28.2 billion10.05% fiscal-year-to-dateNot stated in the report
Meezan Islamic Income FundRs 13.6 billion9.77% fiscal-year-to-date; 1 year 9.21% (benchmark 9.38%)Expense ratio 1.93%; medium risk
Al Ameen Islamic Cash FundRs 29.3 billion1 year 9.93%; 3 years 46.95%Expense ratio 1.06%; no loads; AA+(f)
Alhamra Islamic Money Market FundNot shownNot shownRenamed from MCB Pakistan Frequent Payout Fund in 2020

The UBL cash fund’s confirmed expense ratio of 1.06% and absence of loads is the clearest cost advantage in the table. Meezan’s cash funds are far larger. For more on this category, see Top Money Market Funds in Pakistan.

What We Could Not Verify

  • UBL’s Islamic fund pages and fund-report pages were not accessible for this review, so Al Ameen equity expense ratios, loads, and risk data are missing. Check UBL’s latest FMR.
  • We could not verify MCB’s Islamic cash or income fund returns.
  • Some third-party fund-data sites showed inconsistent figures, and one article that listed many Islamic funds gave undated numbers that did not match official reports, so we did not use it.

How to Choose

If you want…Consider
The largest, longest-running Islamic equity fundMeezan Islamic Fund (launched 2003, about Rs 66 billion)
Lower costs on short-term moneyCompare cash fund expense ratios; UBL’s Al Ameen Islamic Cash Fund shows 1.06%
An Islamic equity fund with a different managerAlhamra Islamic Stock Fund, but check the 3% load and 4.03% expense ratio
Simple digital access with a very small minimumMCB’s iSAVE (from Rs 500) or Al Meezan’s app and wallet options
Time to wait out volatilityEquity funds suit a horizon of five years or more, not months

Risks to Remember

  • Equity risk: Islamic equity funds follow the market and can fall sharply, as 2026 shows.
  • Cost drag: about 4% a year in expenses means the fund must earn that much just to break even before gains.
  • Concentration: the KMI-30 universe leans heavily on oil and gas, cement, fertilizer, and Meezan Bank.
  • Shariah is a screen, not a guarantee of returns: compliance does not reduce market risk.

Final Thoughts

The three fund houses offer similar ranges. Differences that matter are costs, loads, size, and how easy it is to invest. Meezan is the largest and most established in equity; UBL’s cash fund shows the lowest confirmed cost in this review; MCB’s Alhamra offers a very low entry minimum through iSAVE. Compare current FMRs side by side before committing money.

Read our detailed Meezan Islamic Fund review, and see how to start investing via mobile apps.

Found an error or an out-of-date detail? See our editorial policy or tell us.

S

About Sadia Faiz

Sadia Faiz writes on global economic trends, foreign exchange dynamics, and international money transfer channels. Her articles examine currency movements, foreign remittance incentives, and practical solutions for moving funds across borders. Sadia is dedicated to helping overseas Pakistanis understand total transfer costs, exchange rate margins, and compliant banking methods for family support and wealth preservation.

Financial & Investment Disclaimer

Disclaimer: The content on PakGains is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Financial markets, cryptocurrencies, and banking services involve inherent risk. Always conduct your own research or consult with a licensed financial professional before making financial decisions.